| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

April 16 2008 Soc and Info Tech class transcript

Page history last edited by PBworks 15 years, 9 months ago

Society and Information Technology in Second Life

Wednesdays, January 9 - July 30, 2008, 4-6, SLT/PT, 7-9 pm ET

on Berkman island in Second Life - http://slurl.com/secondlife/Berkman/114/70/25

Course homepage - http://socinfotech.pbwiki.com

 

Instructor: Scott MacLeod (not on Harvard's faculty) = Aphilo Aarde (in Second Life)

http://scottmacleod.com/papers.htm

 

 

April 16 2008 Soc and Info Tech class transcript

 

[15:59]  You: Hi Rain!

 

[15:59]  You: Hi Ozzy

 

[15:59]  Rain Ninetails: hi! :)

 

[16:00]  Boston Hutchinson is Online

 

[16:00]  You: Have any of you seen

 

[16:00]  Connecting to in-world Voice Chat...

 

[16:00]  Connected

 

[16:01]  You: "The Future of the Interne," a series of talks by a Stanford professor Ramesh Johari?

 

[16:01]  You: I've posted the first of 5 to the wiki - http://socinfotech.pbwiki.com

 

[16:01]  You: Hello Jayne, Boston!

 

[16:01]  Jayne Urqhart: hi there :)

 

[16:01]  Boston Hutchinson: Hi everybody.

 

[16:01]  Boston Hutchinson: Sorry I'm late!

 

[16:02]  You: You're right on time

 

[16:02]  Rain Ninetails: hee hee

 

[16:02]  Claryssa Schmidt is Online

 

[16:03]  You: videos by Ramesh Johari interesting

 

[16:03]  You: I think you'll find the series of

 

[16:03]  01 Hifeng is Online

 

[16:03]  You: I think you'l find the series of videos by Ramesh Johari interesting.

 

[16:04]  Claryssa Schmidt: hi

 

[16:04]  You: Hi Claryssa

 

[16:04]  Boston Hutchinson: Hi Claryssa

 

[16:04]  You: Besides the talks by Ramesh Johari, you might also find the book

 

[16:04]  You: by Jonathan Zittrain on ""The Future of the Internet" interesting.

 

[16:05]  You: He suggests that the future of the INternet

 

[16:05]  You: to avoid being locked down

 

[16:06]  You: involves millions of users continuing to innovate by making generative

 

[16:06]  You: technologies

 

[16:06]  You: So last week, we were examining some challenges from

 

[16:07]  You: fundamentalism, andways in which identities continue to shape a

 

[16:07]  Gwyneth Llewelyn is Offline

 

[16:07]  You: series of orientations to the Internet

 

[16:08]  You: And with the web, there are also very distinct regional and national appraoches to it.

 

[16:08]  You: Having emerged in signficant ways in teh U.S.

 

[16:09]  You: It remains remarakbly open

 

[16:09]  You: but even in th U.S.

 

[16:09]  You: concernsfor proprietary interests in information

 

[16:10]  You: will threatenthe Internets opennes

 

[16:10]  You: aand in other countries without the legacy of freedom of speech, the internet is much less open

 

[16:11]  You: raise some concerns for the future of the Internet

 

[16:11]  You: This vening, I'd like to recap some significant points from the course, and

 

[16:11]  You: The fundamental thing is

 

[16:11]  You: that information technology is extremely important

 

[16:11]  You: but its future is undetermined

 

[16:12]  You: in terms of the uses of the Internet for freedom, vis-aivs surveillance and police, for example

 

[16:12]  You: in society

 

[16:13]  You: The Internet amplies, deepens, and enhances wahtever we do in

 

[16:13]  You: (I'm experiencing lag)

 

[16:13]  You: And if we are skillful, the Internet will be very good ahead

 

[16:13]  You: It concentrates everything

 

[16:13]  Sonja Strom is Online

 

[16:14]  You: and it's at teh heart of communication

 

[16:14]  You: Talke the technology and use it

 

[16:14]  You: In a way the Internet lies between

 

[16:14]  You: the capital laws of exploitation

 

[16:14]  You: and freedoms and rights

 

[16:14]  You: We are in between

 

[16:15]  You: What are the implications for society - power and ambiguity

 

[16:15]  Gwyneth Llewelyn is Online

 

[16:15]  You: There are a number of challenges ahead that I shall lay out

 

[16:16]  You: The Internet

 

[16:16]  You: The 1st challenge is in terms of freedom itself

 

[16:16]  You: provides global and free communication

 

[16:17]  You: that potentially reaches everyone

 

[16:17]  You: But access can be overrode, controlled, biased and manipulated

 

[16:17]  You: by ideological and politcal interests

 

[16:17]  You: The challenge is for PEOPLE to accept the challenge to own it

 

[16:18]  You: I'm agree with Manuel Castells in not trusting society or anyone with

 

[16:18]  You: the future of the Internet

 

[16:18]  You: We have created a communication tool

 

[16:18]  Veeyawn Spoonhammer is Online

 

[16:18]  You: And this can be privately created, and controlled by government

 

[16:19]  You: Vis-a-vis the Internet, to imagine

 

[16:19]  You: that you might not go to teh beach, the forest, etc. wthout asking for permission

 

[16:20]  You: is a mentality I'd like to avoid in relation to the Internet

 

[16:20]  You: That could happen here, as the Internet becomes appropriated by business

 

[16:20]  You: . . . here in the U.S.

 

[16:21]  You: In Europe , government has regulated business on the Internet

 

[16:21]  You: which is a nice solution, as long as you can trust government

 

[16:21]  You: It's not business vs. government in Europe.

 

[16:22]  You: Just imagine you live in a nice democratic country

 

[16:22]  You: like Austria

 

[16:22]  You: what happens to the Internet, in this case?

 

[16:22]  You: and you have a conservation government vs an ultra right government

 

[16:23]  You: So the future of the Intenret is not about China, but it may be about Austria

 

[16:23]  You: (Please ask, if you have any questions or observations)

 

[16:24]  Gareth Otsuka is Offline

 

[16:24]  You: The beatufy of the type chat in SL is that everybody can contribute to this class as they want

 

[16:24]  You: (I will post this transcript to the class wiki -http://socinfotech.pbwiki.com

 

[16:24]  Carabella Babii: Question

 

[16:24]  You: So in the U.S. the first amendment does apply to the Internet, but it is new

 

[16:25]  Dnate Mars is Offline

 

[16:25]  You: issues are unfolding

 

[16:25]  You: and questions of privitization

 

[16:25]  You: Yes, Carabella?

 

[16:25]  You: published by Yale

 

[16:26]  You: Jonathan Zittrain is quite pessimistic in his "The Future of the Internet"

 

[16:26]  You: He fears a lock down, as commercial interests on the Web grow

 

[16:26]  You: So the first challenges is "Who controls the Internet?"

 

[16:26]  Carabella Babii: I understand that regulation will ensure protection to business but how does it protect the private citizen? or am I incorrect in that observation or understanding

 

[16:26]  You: meaning access.

 

[16:27]  You: The first amendment protects teh citizen

 

[16:27]  You: so anyone can post anything very easily in the U.S., and potentially around the world

 

[16:28]  You: and the Internet has low barriers to access . . .

 

[16:28]  You: once one has a computer

 

[16:28]  You: (We'll look at the Digital Divide next week.

 

[16:28]  You: In terms of who controls the Internet

 

[16:29]  You: a key question is "under which controls can one participate?

 

[16:29]  You: It dependsupon the controlling processes - by business, political ideologies, etc.

 

[16:29]  You: The 2nd challenge is

 

[16:29]  You: "Does everybody have access?"

 

[16:30]  You: Exclusion from networks of information technology are an ongoing problem

 

[16:30]  You: And more particuarly a challenge

 

[16:30]  You: And we will look at teh Digital Divide next week.

 

[16:31]  You: There are different forms of exlusion

 

[16:31]  You: 1infrastructure

 

[16:31]  You: 2 economic

 

[16:31]  You: 3 bureaucratic

 

[16:31]  You: 3 cultural / educational

 

[16:32]  You: 5 the inability to influence content in networks

 

[16:32]  You: The THIRD major challenge

 

[16:32]  You: is societal

 

[16:32]  You: In a society where information processing is essential

 

[16:32]  You: it becomes important

 

[16:33]  Carabella Babii: Question:

 

[16:33]  You: to learn information processing skills

 

[16:33]  You: for all of us to learn these

 

[16:33]  You: Certain kinds of education

 

[16:33]  You: can be digitally stored

 

[16:34]  You: And about 95% of kids have access to computers in the U.S

 

[16:34]  You: How you become able to use and apply

 

[16:34]  You: this information

 

[16:34]  You: requries not only good education

 

[16:34]  You: But an education where people can think for and by themselves

 

[16:35]  You: where people can think critically

 

[16:35]  You: And this involves

 

[16:35]  You: constant reprogramming

 

[16:36]  You: in a world in which everything is

 

[16:36]  You: cahnging

 

[16:36]  You: that is in a relative world

 

[16:36]  You: that is flexile

 

[16:36]  You: So this requries a kind of personality

 

[16:37]  You: flexible and secure

 

[16:37]  You: that can adapt, but not breakdown

 

[16:37]  Gwyneth Llewelyn is Offline

 

[16:37]  You: So we need certain types of schools and teachers, and pedagogy

 

[16:37]  You: which we don't have

 

[16:37]  You: the issue is not computers which are flexible

 

[16:38]  You: We have an extraordinary potential to shape a world based on ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY

 

[16:39]  You: Athenian democracy involves a highly educated group

 

[16:39]  You: of citizens with enough material

 

[16:39]  You: well-being and with education, self-reflection, and a sophisticated society

 

[16:40]  You: (But in Athenian Society around 2400 years ago, the majority were barbaric or slaves)

 

[16:40]  You: you're not o.k.

 

[16:40]  You: This is not to say that if you are not in the Internet

 

[16:40]  Carabella Babii: but who would determine this and will this only be reflected in the US as dominant

 

[16:40]  Gwyneth Llewelyn is Online

 

[16:40]  You: But we are moving to a situation where a small minority are a highly educated elite

 

[16:41]  You: are so important.

 

[16:41]  You: Yes, Carabella - which is why efforts like the one laptop per child - the XO - MIT Negorponte's $100 dollar laptop

 

[16:42]  You: And why organziations like the Berkman Center for Internet and Society

 

[16:42]  You: which is helping to shape these socail processes, both legally and societally

 

[16:42]  Carabella Babii: but how does that help a child when the parent is illerate in computers

 

[16:42]  You: by emphasizing things like open source, and innovation are essential

 

[16:43]  You: As I menitoned above teaching and pedagogy are as important

 

[16:44]  You: The folwing is a fascinating video that debunks Third World myths

 

[16:44]  You: by a Swedish professor Hans Rosling

 

[16:44]  You: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/92

 

[16:44]  You: using statistics that are exciting to observe

 

[16:44]  You: And here is information about One Laptop Per Child

 

[16:45]  You: Which uses only free software

 

[16:45]  You: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Laptop_per_Child

 

[16:45]  Diego Ibanez is Online

 

[16:45]  You: and is designed specifically for child ownership in the developing world

 

[16:45]  Carabella Babii: hmm interesting, thank you

 

[16:45]  You: But the digital divide is very signficant

 

[16:46]  You: very

 

[16:46]  You: So, education is highly erratic

 

[16:46]  You: There's little education i the ghettoes

 

[16:46]  You: How to get more sophisticated teachers there is a key question.

 

[16:47]  You: You have to pay

 

[16:47]  You: And recognize socially

 

[16:47]  You: the value of teachers

 

[16:47]  You: is immense

 

[16:48]  You: The gap between the kind of education needed to make society work and what is really happening

 

[16:48]  You: The 4th CHALLENGE

 

[16:48]  You: The emergence of a networking

 

[16:48]  You: business model

 

[16:48]  You: and the individualization of work and employment

 

[16:48]  You: which undermines what used to guide industrail relations

 

[16:49]  You: i.e. the welfare state

 

[16:49]  You: ie.collective bargaining agreements

 

[16:49]  Diego Ibanez is Offline

 

[16:49]  You: i.e. workers' rights

 

[16:49]  You: All these institutions are being undermined by indiviudalization

 

[16:49]  You: There's a growing percentage of people with no permanent contract

 

[16:49]  You: They aren't guaranteed employment

 

[16:49]  Cindy Ecksol is Online

 

[16:50]  You: and a new form emerges - flexible employment

 

[16:50]  You: If you look at many contracts

 

[16:50]  You: look at the fine print

 

[16:50]  You: "In case of a dispute between labor and mangement, you commit to arbitration"

 

[16:51]  You: and this elminates enforced workers' rights

 

[16:51]  You: empyment becomes a private matter and not a public one

 

[16:51]  You: Once you accpet with your signature that you're not under laws protecting you, you a

 

[16:51]  You: you are privatizing - and you have no more rights

 

[16:51]  Cindy Ecksol is Offline

 

[16:52]  You: The model for the network enterprise challenges these rights

 

[16:52]  You: The model for the network enterpreise

 

[16:53]  Cindy Ecksol is Online

 

[16:53]  You: but it does include all the advantages

 

[16:53]  You: productivity

 

[16:53]  You: competetiveness

 

[16:53]  You: personal choice

 

[16:53]  You: dynamism

 

[16:53]  You: and creativity

 

[16:53]  You: The 5th challenge

 

[16:54]  You: has to do with regulated markets and the global economy

 

[16:54]  You: all of which have rules

 

[16:54]  You: and all of which are covered by the authority of democractic states

 

[16:54]  You: When this breaks down - i.e. in Russia -

 

[16:54]  You: there aren't any rules, and what you have left are thugs.

 

[16:55]  You: So the market s are not the contrary

 

[16:55]  You: And the market needs rules and institutions

 

[16:55]  You: Capital grows because there are rules

 

[16:55]  You: The notion of the wild East

 

[16:56]  You: which includes violence and appropriation

 

[16:56]  You: is an interesting coutnerexample

 

[16:56]  You: Capitalism may be harsh

 

[16:56]  You: but it is not a system of theft.

 

[16:56]  You: What happened with capitalism

 

[16:57]  You: was that a system of market rules was created at a national level

 

[16:57]  You: Now the economy and markets are global, and institutions are national

 

[16:57]  You: So global financial markets are in essence possible to regulate

 

[16:58]  Daisyblue Hefferman is Offline

 

[16:58]  You: Political and economic measures are possible

 

[16:58]  You: We don't always know if they'll work

 

[16:58]  You: But we haven't tried.

 

[16:58]  Dnate Mars is Online

 

[16:58]  You: And we'll continue to try very little for a while

 

[16:59]  You: Brazil in the years around the millenium change wanted regulation!

 

[16:59]  You: So these challenges explain contradictions

 

[16:59]  You: and it's a time of creativity

 

[16:59]  You: and wealth creation

 

[17:00]  You: And as this continues, most, regardless of economic prosperity,

 

[17:00]  You: are SCARED due to rapid change

 

[17:01]  Daisyblue Hefferman is Online

 

[17:01]  You: They are scared of change, but also scared by the lack of ability to have any tool, or mecahism to influence change.

 

[17:01]  You: So let's take a 10 minute break soon

 

[17:01]  You: I more thatn welcome questions and observations

 

[17:02]  You: See you at 12 past the hour

 

[17:02]  You: wehn we return

 

[17:02]  You: :)

 

[17:05]  Michele Mrigesh is Offline

 

[17:07]  Veeyawn Spoonhammer is Offline

 

[17:11]  You: Observations?

 

[17:11]  You: Are there questions?

 

[17:12]  You: I've posted the transcript thus far, here - http://socinfotech.pbwiki.com/April-16-2008-Soc-and-Info-Tech-class-transcript

 

[17:12]  You: Boston?

 

[17:12]  You: Jayne?

 

[17:12]  You: Claryssa?

 

[17:12]  You: Knildrig?

 

[17:12]  You: Others?

 

[17:12]  You: Rain?

 

[17:12]  Knildrig Aabye: yes

 

[17:12]  Rain Ninetails: :)

 

[17:12]  Boston Hutchinson: I wonder what effect virtual worlds are having on labor

 

[17:13]  You: Yes Knildirg?

 

[17:13]  You: Good question . . .

 

[17:13]  You: I think VWs are still very new

 

[17:13]  Knildrig Aabye: what do you think of twitter ?

 

[17:13]  You: and their impact

 

[17:14]  You: and most high tech firms are not unionized - Linden Lab which makes Second Life only has about 250 employees

 

[17:14]  Knildrig Aabye: .

 

[17:15]  You: And World of War Craft is probably similar.

 

[17:15]  You: So inworld labor is probably even smaller

 

[17:16]  Sonja Strom is Offline

 

[17:16]  You: Twitter is another fascinating exmaple of a social networking tool . . .

 

[17:16]  You: and an example of ongoing innovation

 

[17:16]  Knildrig Aabye: i love twitter

 

[17:16]  Boston Hutchinson: The economy inside SL and WoW is small now, but could become a significant part of the total economy, especially if RL services are rendered in SL, which should be possible for jobs like programming, website development, even some medical and legal...

 

[17:16]  You: And it's convergences that emerge from such technological innovation that can

 

[17:17]  You: lead to remarkable new developments

 

[17:17]  You: Knildrig

 

[17:17]  You: I thinkit's very cool, too.

 

[17:17]  You: Yes, Boston, and while

 

[17:18]  You: high tech jobs tend to pay very well.

 

[17:18]  You: labor has played a very small role in the IT reovlution, due to individualization in society

 

[17:18]  Knildrig Aabye: jason calacanis is twittering and u-streaming live making price draws to increase followers, i was amazed watching him

 

[17:18]  You: And I agree that virtual worlds

 

[17:18]  You: are fascinating and potentially explosive

 

[17:19]  Knildrig Aabye: i like 1938media too :)

 

[17:19]  You: because you will be able to do almost everyhing in world that you do in real life

 

[17:19]  You: cool, knildrig

 

[17:19]  You: when avatars start to become like us,

 

[17:19]  You: when avatars become agents on their own

 

[17:19]  You: when vws come to be exactly like real life

 

[17:20]  You: when what we do in virtual worlds happens in real life and vice versa

 

[17:20]  You: the world will be very different,

 

[17:20]  You: and while many of these ideas are

 

[17:21]  You: science fiction now, they all seem possible - but how soon - maybe very soon.

 

[17:21]  You: Look at Second LIfe - the seeds for such are already here

 

[17:21]  You: it's just convergences ahead, don't you think?

 

[17:22]  You: "it's just a matter of ..."

 

[17:23]  You: So, to return to what we've been talking about, most institutions are in deep crisis

 

[17:23]  You: Robert Putnam at Harvard, talks about the practical emptiness of most labor unions.

 

[17:23]  You: And governments havne't responded to people's problems

 

[17:23]  You: Manuel Castells thinks

 

[17:24]  You: ... so objectively,

 

[17:24]  You: But people also think so

 

[17:24]  You: And under such conditions, people are facing some insecurity

 

[17:25]  You: of different kinds

 

[17:25]  You: 1)

 

[17:25]  You: ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION

 

[17:26]  You: a). through the ability of netowrks to scan the planet relentlessly to exploit resources in order to sell

 

[17:26]  You: b) this accelerates economic growth and depletes resources

 

[17:26]  You: We're not in a time of sustainable development

 

[17:27]  You: where 50% are included as beneficiaries of this growth

 

[17:27]  You: but 50% aren't

 

[17:27]  You: It isn't possible to live as welive in hte U.S. globally.

 

[17:27]  You: If you multiply the number of people today

 

[17:28]  You: by the same levels of pollution looking ahead

 

[17:28]  You: you destroy people but not the planet

 

[17:28]  You: It doesn't mean we have to reduce our standard of living

 

[17:28]  You: In order to include everybody in an advanced form of production and consumption

 

[17:29]  You: we have to change, not grow

 

[17:29]  You: We need 0% growth

 

[17:30]  You: In the increasing consumption equation, with the current population growth projections, it's unsustainable

 

[17:30]  You: And missle defense cannot control pollution in China

 

[17:30]  You: There is another side of

 

[17:30]  You: information technology

 

[17:31]  You: that can lead to sustainable development

 

[17:31]  You: We can now know due to information technology

 

[17:31]  You: what is and isn't sustainable

 

[17:31]  You: We can now define which kind of

 

[17:31]  You: hybrid car is necessary

 

[17:32]  You: at every level of production and consumption, for example.

 

[17:32]  Geda Hax is Online

 

[17:32]  You: Why not?

 

[17:32]  You: IN this sense, information technology can save us

 

[17:32]  You: The automobile industry has vested interests against this

 

[17:32]  You: The mejaor interests - oil and power companies - have amortgage on the future.

 

[17:33]  You: After the debacles of power loss in Californiaa around the turn of the millenium people

 

[17:33]  You: in California are afraid of having no electricty

 

[17:34]  You: This retractable drousing, by computers, however, can make a transformation of models of habitat

 

[17:34]  You: If we identify which problems are soluable by information technology

 

[17:35]  You: Information technology creates the possibility of sustainable development

 

[17:35]  You: The transformation of the model of production and consumption vis-a-vis living is possible

 

[17:36]  You: Knowing and inputting could provide tools that make possible sustainable development

 

[17:36]  You: Things won't change unless however the enviornmental changes them

 

[17:36]  You: environmental *movement

 

[17:36]  You: Things never change without impetus from the outside

 

[17:37]  You: -pressure is needed

 

[17:37]  You: - and alternative models, which enlightened segments of elites might change.

 

[17:37]  You: A storng envionrmental movement - an extraordinary movement -

 

[17:37]  You: organized in and aournd the Internet

 

[17:38]  You: can mobilize pressures and camapigns

 

[17:38]  You: in business

 

[17:38]  Michele Mrigesh is Online

 

[17:38]  You: and politically

 

[17:38]  You: 1) knowledge!

 

[17:38]  You: So information technology offers

 

[17:38]  You: and 2) a political tool!

 

[17:38]  You: Today the greatest fears is

 

[17:39]  You: a great fear - in polls about information technology

 

[17:39]  You: the creation of a kind of "Frankenstein"

 

[17:40]  You: of monsters that develop out of the abilities of science

 

[17:40]  You: In Europe, you had mad cow diesease, and foot and mouth disease

 

[17:40]  You: and these had to do with bad health controls and feeding practices.

 

[17:40]  You: And this fits with ancestral fears of genetic maniplation

 

[17:41]  You: The vision of 500,000 cows killed and burned in the night

 

[17:41]  You: strikes fear in people, that you are

 

[17:41]  You: -out of control

 

[17:41]  You: - creating monsters

 

[17:41]  You: And the notion of sensors everywhere

 

[17:42]  You: i.e. visions that emerge out of the MIT media lab, and Cal Tech, for example - scare people

 

[17:42]  You: And this fear is connected to genetic implants

 

[17:42]  You: And all of this isn't science fiction

 

[17:42]  You: Bil Joy, one of the creators of UNIX at UC Berkeley

 

[17:42]  You: Bil Joy, one of the creators of UNIX at UC Berkeley

 

[17:43]  You: - pbulshed an artile in "Wired" explaining

 

[17:43]  You: the dangers of technology

 

[17:43]  You: around the turn of the millenium

 

[17:43]  You: It was critical of trends in robotics

 

[17:44]  You: wher researchers have already produced self reproducing robots

 

[17:44]  Abigail Tinkel is Offline

 

[17:45]  You: All already

 

[17:45]  You: self reproducing robots - which are programmed to have this capability

 

[17:45]  You: scare peopel

 

[17:46]  You: Here's Bill Joy's "the Future Doesn't Need Us"

 

[17:46]  You: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html

 

[17:47]  You: Some of the most telling things are nanotechnoloyg inside bodies

 

[17:47]  You: Agents inside our bodies are doing nice things

 

[17:47]  You: but are growing fear in the world

 

[17:47]  You: - that we have unleashed a revolution wihtout

 

[17:47]  You: moral, ethical, social, and political control

 

[17:47]  Michele Mrigesh is Offline

 

[17:48]  You: Technology ahead of social, mental, instituional abilities to control them scare people

 

[17:48]  You: Just a few more things before we close -- Nuclear technology bombs

 

[17:49]  You: The notion that the way to control is by stopping threats is unrealastic

 

[17:49]  You: For some reason, our species lieks to experiment

 

[17:49]  You: And the level of technical capacity is way beyond - on a large scale - what people think

 

[17:50]  You: There's kind of a mentality where if you have a toy, you play

 

[17:50]  You: And the most fundamental challenge is when you say

 

[17:50]  You: We are the government

 

[17:50]  You: that controls, regulates and adapts these technologies

 

[17:51]  You: WHO IS WE?

 

[17:51]  You: Becuase who we is isn't obvious

 

[17:51]  Michele Mrigesh is Online

 

[17:51]  You: Who are the actors?

 

[17:51]  You: It's literally impossible to control what's happened in society

 

[17:52]  You: Are they governemnts?

 

[17:52]  You: what are the institutions?

 

[17:52]  You: How do we control these?

 

[17:52]  You: How do people organize?

 

[17:52]  You: Now we have extrordinary mistrusts

 

[17:52]  You: and a great incapacity of government to control trends

 

[17:53]  You: And th egovernment is accelarting trends.

 

[17:53]  You: And there's still a reliance on party politics

 

[17:53]  You: on bureaucrats

 

[17:53]  You: moey

 

[17:53]  You: and politicians who want re-election

 

[17:53]  You: Who will control this Information Technology revolution?

 

[17:53]  You: Business?

 

[17:54]  You: Corporate business is showing

 

[17:54]  You: responsbility, but they don't have the role to control these processes?

 

[17:54]  Morrhys Graysmark is Online

 

[17:54]  You: And you don't want business to control this

 

[17:55]  You: Well, grass roots' organizations can influence some change

 

[17:55]  You: but independent from busienss or government

 

[17:55]  You: There are very few grass roots organziations, however, that can organize society

 

[17:56]  You: and some are dependent on churches

 

[17:56]  You: but a spiritual role can't organize society.

 

[17:56]  You: So, Civil Society is weak

 

[17:56]  You: And government can't control

 

[17:56]  You: and it isn't businesses role to control

 

[17:57]  You: So, going back to governemnt

 

[17:57]  You: Which kind of government do we want?

 

[17:57]  You: And how can that be generated?

 

[17:57]  You: That's where the equation is still unsolved

 

[17:57]  You: How to reconstruct solutions ?

 

[17:57]  You: - so that people can establish paths to technological change?

 

[17:58]  You: If we define where the problem is, we can design solutions

 

[17:58]  You: And the problem lies in the collapse of the public sphere

 

[17:58]  You: Political institutions are lagging way behind

 

[17:58]  You: -technologies

 

[17:58]  You: -markets

 

[17:59]  You: There are sophisticated individuals

 

[17:59]  You: But they all don't make a society.

 

[17:59]  You: And the inability to tackle these challenges leads to others

 

[17:59]  You: where the collectivization of individuals is offset by me first

 

[18:00]  You: We still need some backup system of family, community

 

[18:00]  You: but this is old

 

[18:00]  You: And the last 20 years have changed a lot

 

[18:00]  You: We're on teh threshold a pure collection of individuals

 

[18:00]  You: which will decrease the capacity of society.

 

[18:01]  You: So that's enough for this evening.

 

[18:01]  You: Questions? Observations?

 

[18:01]  You: i'll post the transcript here - http://socinfotech.pbwiki.com/April-16-2008-Soc-and-Info-Tech-class-transcript

 

[18:01]  Jayne Urqhart: thank you so much, Aphilo - fascinating as usual

 

[18:02]  You: Thanks, Jayne!

 

[18:02]  You: And thanks for coming!

 

[18:02]  Claryssa Schmidt: thanks Aphilo

 

[18:02]  You: Next week - the digital divide

 

[18:02]  Rain Ninetails: :)

 

[18:02]  Jayne Urqhart: you mentioned that there may be plans for extending the schedule?

 

[18:02]  You: Thanks Claryssa, Rain

 

[18:02]  You: Boston . . .

 

[18:02]  01 Hifeng: interesting, thanks :)

 

[18:02]  You: I'm still deliberating about that Jayne . . .

 

[18:02]  You: Thanks 01 Hifeng!

 

[18:03]  Luna Bliss is Offline

 

[18:03]  Boston Hutchinson: I see two problems in solving the "crisis" you have identified: 1. can we identify specific risks soon enough? 2. Can we do anything about them?

 

[18:03]  You: On the societal level, they are so many and involved, Boston,

 

[18:04]  You: that it makes solving them problematic indeed

 

[18:04]  Boston Hutchinson: Well, we failed to identify the mortgage crisis.

 

[18:04]  Boston Hutchinson: We failed to fix global warming.

 

[18:04]  You: Even with the ability of IT to offer ways of analyzing and desinging solutions, the societal processes in the aggregate, especially concerning governance

 

[18:04]  You: aren't obvious,

 

[18:04]  Boston Hutchinson: Two different kinds of failures.

 

[18:04]  You: so I'm skeptical, Boston

 

[18:05]  Alexicon Kurka is Offline

 

[18:05]  You: I have to get out of the cafe where i am

 

[18:05]  Boston Hutchinson: But maybe we could solve other problems if the vested interests are not so strong.

 

[18:05]  You: Yes, little bits at a time

 

[18:06]  You: so to speak :)

 

[18:06]  Claryssa Schmidt is Offline

 

[18:06]  Boston Hutchinson: The hypothetical "gray goo" problem is in nobody's interest to tolerate, for example, unlike global warming.

 

[18:07]  You: problematic

 

[18:07]  You: and national sovereingty issues vs the U.N. history make global governacne

 

[18:08]  Boston Hutchinson: On the other hand, nobody wants gray goo or nuclear war.

 

[18:08]  Boston Hutchinson: A lot of people (oil companies) don't want to fix global warming.

 

[18:09]  You: True, and corporations are more profitable in peace

 

[18:10]  Boston Hutchinson: So maybe there is a will to prevent these things, the extinction problems, as opposed to the lesser disasters.

 

[18:10]  You: So a strong environmental movement will continue - Al Gores' campaign

 

[18:10]  You: for example - the societal costs of global warming are ginormous

 

[18:11]  Morrhys Graysmark is Offline

 

[18:11]  You: Let's hope so . . .

 

[18:11]  You: enormous . . . so I have to go . . . See you soon!

 

[18:12]  Boston Hutchinson: Thanks for class.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.